AI Accessibility Testing Software

Accessible checks your site three ways: automated WCAG 2.2 scanning of every page, a simulated screen-reader user that attempts your real journeys, and monitoring that records the barriers real visitors hit in production, each finding mapped to the WCAG 2.2 criterion it fails.

Start free See pricing

Passed. 1 · Sign-in form — labels announced
Passed. 2 · Submit — error summary takes focus
Passed. 3 · Dashboard — heading level 1 announced
Serious. 4 · Search field — placeholder, no label
Critical. 5 · Results — list replaced silently
Not evaluated. 6–7 · not reached

Completed 3 of 7 stepsWCAG 4.1.3 · 3.3.2

Example output, produced by Accessible on a test site. Not a customer site, and no customer data is shown.

Automated accessibility scanning

Discovery finds the URLs. axe-core in a real Chromium browser checks each one against WCAG 2.2 — on a schedule, or the moment a deploy ships. Unlimited pages, in every paid plan.

Sitemap-aware crawl, with every URL yours to accept or reject
Violations, passes, and the incomplete checks a machine could not settle
A 0–100 score per page, withheld when a page could not be fully evaluated
Scheduled re-scans (every paid plan schedules scans weekly) and single pages on demand; every URL on demand on Professional and Enterprise, and a deploy webhook for CI on Professional and Enterprise
Fix guidance with the markup change, in React, Vue, Angular and plain HTML

Rule checking covers the part of WCAG a machine can decide. The rest is what journeys and monitoring are for.

Screen reader journey testing

Name the task. A simulated screen-reader user drives a real browser through it by heading, landmark, role and tab order, records what was announced at every stop, and reports the step it broke on and the steps it never reached.

Multi-step flows across page loads, forms, validation and error recovery
The transcript — what was announced — not just the DOM
Journeys proposed by discovery, or written step by step
Steps after the break marked not evaluated, never passed

The one thing that draws on credits. Every run shows its cost before you start it, and your first plan opens with a trial balance.

Real user monitoring

A small script on your site records the barriers real visitors meet — on the routes they actually take, in states a crawl never reaches — and ranks each one by how many sessions hit it.

Ranked by share of sessions, with a confidence interval, not by rule severity alone
Focus traps, focus lost after route changes, and invisible focus, caught in real sessions
Keyboard-driven sessions counted separately
Route patterns only — no page content, no visitor data

Free on every plan, including Monitor, which is monitoring alone with no card and no expiry.

Findings leave the product

The end of the workflow is an export for your own tracker or a report on someone's desk, not another dashboard to visit.

Triage
Filter and bulk-action findings by severity, status and criterion across every domain.
Exports and reports
CSV export, an activity report, a draft VPAT/ACR and a public posture page.

WCAG 2.2, the ADA, Section 508 and the EAA

Accessible tests against WCAG 2.2, which builds on the 2.0 and 2.1 versions most rules still name. The table shows which version each rule points at — not a promise that testing makes you compliant with it. No automated tool can, and the WCAG 2.2 guide explains why.

Accessibility rules, who they apply to, and the WCAG version each references
Rule	Applies to	Technical standard it references
ADA Title II	US state and local governments	WCAG 2.1 Level AA, under the Department of Justice rule published in April 2024. Compliance dates are April 26, 2027 for entities serving 50,000 people or more, and April 26, 2028 for smaller ones.
ADA Title III	US businesses open to the public	No WCAG version is set by regulation. Department of Justice guidance names WCAG and the Section 508 Standards as helpful technical guidance.
Section 508	US federal agencies and the technology they procure	WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA, incorporated by reference in the 2017 refresh.
European Accessibility Act	Products and services sold to EU consumers after June 28, 2025	Conformity runs through the harmonised standard EN 301 549. Version 3.2.1 (WCAG 2.1 AA) remains the reference; version 4.1.1, which adopts WCAG 2.2, was published in September 2026 and awaits formal citation.

Sources

Fact Sheet: New Rule on the Accessibility of Web Content and Mobile Apps (opens in a new tab). U.S. Department of Justice, April 2024.
Guidance on Web Accessibility and the ADA (opens in a new tab). U.S. Department of Justice, March 18, 2022.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines (opens in a new tab). U.S. Access Board, January 18, 2017.
Directive (EU) 2019/882 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (opens in a new tab). EUR-Lex, April 17, 2019.
European accessibility standard EN 301 549 has been updated (opens in a new tab). AccessibleEU (European Commission), September 7, 2026.

Monitoring free. Scanning unmetered. Pay for journeys.

Plans are priced per domain, from $99 a month, and journey runs draw on credits that roll over. Monitor is free with no card and no expiry.

See pricing

Frequently asked questions

What is AI accessibility testing software?

Software that uses automation and AI models to find accessibility barriers on a website. In Accessible that means three things: axe-core rule checks on every page, a simulated screen-reader user that attempts real tasks and reports where it got stuck, and a script that records the barriers real visitors hit. The AI part is the journey — deciding what to press next and judging what was announced — while rule checks stay deterministic.

Will automated testing make my site ADA or EAA compliant?

No tool can do that, including this one. Legal compliance depends on which rule applies to you and on things no automated test measures. What Accessible gives you is a dated record of what was tested, what was found and what was fixed — evidence of the work, not a certificate.

Which standard does Accessible test against?

WCAG 2.2, Level AA by default. Scans can also include Level AAA rules, and every finding is mapped to the success criterion it fails and given a severity, so it reads as user impact rather than a rule ID.

Do I need scanning, journeys and monitoring?

They answer different questions. A scan says which rules each page breaks; a journey says whether a screen-reader user can finish a task and where they could not; monitoring says which barriers real visitors actually met, and how often. A site can pass the first and fail the other two.

What is the AI Overview?

A briefing written for your organization from your own scans, journeys and monitoring: what changed, and what to fix first, ranked by how many real visitors it reaches. Every number in it comes from your results, never from the model. It is included on every paid plan.

How is it priced?

Per domain. Monitoring is free, including on the no-card Monitor plan. Scanning is unmetered on every paid plan. Journey runs draw on monthly credits, every run shows its cost before it starts, and unused credits roll over.

Find the step your customers can't get past.

Monitoring is free, and scanning is unmetered on every paid plan. Journeys draw on credits, and your first plan opens with a trial balance.

Start free How the three layers fit