Scans pass. Real people still get stuck at checkout, login, sign-up, or search.
Accessible monitors real visitors, scans every page against WCAG 2.2, and runs a simulated screen-reader user through your key journeys — so you know what actually blocks people, and can prove you fixed it.
Scan every page
Every page against WCAG 2.2, in a real browser
Passed. /checkout/payment0 violations
Test every journey
A simulated screen-reader user tries to check out
Steps 1 to 5 completed, with a serious issue at step 3. Critical: blocked at step 6 of 9. Steps 7 to 9 not reached.
“edit, blank” × 4card number input has no accessible name
Monitor real users
One script reports the barriers real visitors meet
Weighted by how many people hit them, including logged-in pages no crawler reaches. It reads your pages and never changes them.
<script data-site-key="acc_rum_…">
Every run is dated into one record, so you can prove you fixed it.
Example run, produced by Accessible on a test storefront. Not a customer site, and no customer data is shown.
Free monitoring, no card · scanning on every paid plan · a diagnostic, never an overlay
Start with one page, free
Checked against WCAG 2.2 with the same engine every paid plan runs. A scan is the first layer — the barrier below is one no scan can see.
What the free check coversEvery finding arrives ready to forward
The same five fields every time, so a finding can be read, argued with and forwarded. This is the hero's step 6, as the product files it.
- Evidence
- “edit, blank” × 4— what the screen reader actually announced
- Criterion
- WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (Level A)
- Severity
- Critical. Critical— the journey cannot continue
- Who it stops
- A blind user reaches the card field and hears no label — nothing to tell it from the three inputs beside it. No scan reported a violation on this page.
- Remediation
- Give the input an accessible name — a <label for> or an aria-label — then re-run the journey to confirm the step clears.
Classified against WCAG 2.2 Level AA with a published severity rubric. A clean scan is never reported as evidence that a screen-reader user can finish the task.
Three layers of testing. One record with dates on it.
Scanning proves you checked every page. A journey proves someone could finish the task. Monitoring proves you kept watching. Every run is dated and kept, so the record builds itself instead of being assembled the week you need it.
Automated scanning
Every URL against WCAG 2.2 in a real browser, on a schedule, and on every deploy on Professional and Enterprise. Unmetered, with triage, fix guidance and export included.
How scanning worksScreen reader simulation
A simulated screen-reader user attempts a real task — sign in, search, check out — and reports the step where it became impossible, with what was announced as evidence.
How journeys workReal user monitoring
One script reports the barriers real visitors met, on logged-in pages and dynamic content no crawler reaches. It reads your pages. It never changes them.
How monitoring works
Most tools ship one layer
We know of no other platform that runs all three against one record — check us against anything you are considering, see the comparisons.
And none of it is an overlay
No injected ARIA, no rewritten markup, no toolbar. This is a diagnostic: its whole footprint is one script tag, and every fix lands in your code.
So there is something to hand over
Of the US digital accessibility lawsuits filed in 2025, 1,427 companies had already faced one. A fix that was never re-checked is what that number is made of.
Scan history
Every run, dated, per URL and per domain.
Activity record
What was tested, found and fixed, over time.
Draft conformance report
A VPAT/ACR from your own evidence, per criterion.
Public posture page
A shareable page and badge, showing when you last tested.
Testing on a schedule is not a legal guarantee, and no tool can certify compliance; what it leaves behind is a dated record of the work (our Terms). Lawsuit figure from UsableNet's 2025 year-end report (opens in a new tab), an external source about the market.
Run accessibility for every client, one domain at a time.
Each client's domain is its own workspace with its own record: CSV, activity report, draft VPAT/ACR and posture page. Pool journey credits across clients with an org add-on. You deliver the fixes; the monitoring keeps running.
Questions worth asking any accessibility vendor
Is this an accessibility overlay or widget?
No. Nothing is injected, rewritten or added to your page, and your visitors see nothing — one script reads the page and reports. Fixes land in your own code, where they still work if you stop paying us.
How is this different from running an axe-core scanner?
It includes one, unmetered, on every page. That is layer one, and alone it only tells you which rules your markup breaks. Layer two sends a simulated screen-reader user through a real task and reports where it became impossible. Layer three records what real visitors hit in production.
What does it cost?
Monitoring is free for one domain, no card. Paid plans start at $99 per domain per month with unlimited scanning — no page cap, no per-page charge. Journey runs are the only metered thing, and every plan includes a credit balance that rolls over.
Will this stop me being sued?
No, and no tool can honestly promise it — automated testing cannot certify conformance. What it leaves behind is a dated record of what was tested, when, what was found and what was fixed. That is what you show when somebody asks.
See what actually blocks people on your site.
Monitor one domain free, with no card. Add scanning and screen-reader journeys when you want the whole record.